Alien

Yet another film that has caused more than a few people to ask me “How have you not seen that yet?”, Alien has long been regarded as both a classic science-fiction film and a classic horror film. The film brought both Sigourney Weaver and director Ridley Scott to prominence, and created one of the most iconic movie monsters — possibly the most iconic of the modern era. It’s been parodied and homaged and sequelized many, many times.

Given its pop-culture ubiquity (at least in horror film fan circuits), there’s a degree of familiarity with it even without having actually seen it. To some extent, watching it might have been even more enjoyable for me if I had been able to watch it fresh, without any preconceptions, the way people viewing it on its initial release would have been. In my defense, the film was released in May 1979, and I was only three months old at the time. Even had my parents taken me to see it, it probably wouldn’t have made an impression at that time.

To the lament of child psychologists, I’m sure.

The story builds slowly, but inexorably. The characters are introduced briefly, without much in the way of backstory or interaction before the plot arrives. We’re told the Nostromo is a commercial cargo ship, hauling ore from a mining operation back to Earth, and we see some flashes of personality from the seven person crew. Despite the brevity of the character building, a combination of a few choice lines and the adept acting from the stars give a sense of real personalities to the characters. Yaphet Kotto and Harry Dean Stanton are the ship mechanics; one a loudmouth, the other laconic, both a bit lazy and concerned over their paychecks. Ian Holm is Ash, the ship’s science officer, stand-offish and just a bit off, period. Veronica Cartwright is Lambert, who seems to have a bit of nervous energy even before the plot kicks in. Sigourney Weaver, as Ellen Ripley, is the warrant officer, and a stickler for rules. Captain Dallas, played by Tom Skerritt, is more of a stickler for his authority. And then there’s Kane, played by John Hurt, who seems a little more adventurous, which proves important when the crew receives an apparent distress signal from a planet that, upon landing, appears uninhabited. (I don’t have to point out that appearances are deceiving here, do I?)

In the future, many fields undergo advances in technology, such as face lifts.

The film is considered a genre-blend between science fiction and horror, and it succeeds masterfully at both. From a science fiction standpoint, the technology shown is wonderfully low-tech for the future — rather than everything being bright and shiny and in perfect working order, the Nostromo truly looks and feels like a well-used vehicle, just a futuristic one. The crew doesn’t have fancy weapons because they never anticipated needing them. (The computer, admittedly, may seem a bit out of date today, but given the time it was made, this is not only forgivable, but completely expected.) The alien world is also designed magnificently, and is a real treat. And, of course, the aliens themselves are some of the most macabre yet believable creations to come out of science fiction cinema. H.R. Giger absolutely deserves to have his work acknowledged here, as these things are the stuff nightmares are made of. And aside from a few scenes where a model is clearly being used, the full-grown alien moves believably, thanks to being an elaborate costume over a tall actor (Bolaji Badejo). It all adds up to a solid work of science fiction.

From a horror standpoint, the film also succeeds. Seven people, isolated in a ship, with no way out and a remorseless and apparently unstoppable killer. There’s a feeling of claustrophobia to the environment, and a sense that the danger could be just outside of the characters’ vision — or the audience’s. This is heightened by some very effective lighting techniques by Ridley Scott, and a decision to keep the alien off screen for large parts of the chase, leading the audience to wonder as much as the characters just when it would turn up again.

I always feel like… somebody’s watching me…

Alien makes for a very good science-fiction movie, and a very good horror movie… and as both, it’s just a very good movie, period. My only complaint with the film, and it’s not a major one, was that I didn’t like part of the revelation about Ash, though I do like the narrative flow of his actions. It’s just the other part that felt a little bit chintzy and unnecessary to me. But even with that, Alien was still a highly entertaining film.

It’s small wonder that the film made a star out of Sigourney Weaver and made Ridley Scott a director to watch. It’s also no wonder that the franchise has been revisited multiple times since. If nothing else, I’m definitely going to be checking out Aliens some day; but Alien has set the bar pretty high.

Rating: 5 Pumpkins

Advertisements

About Morgan R. Lewis

Fan of movies and other media
This entry was posted in Halloween Haunters and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

25 Responses to Alien

  1. le0pard13 says:

    Wonderfully unsettling back then, a certified classic now. Great look at this one, Morgan.

    • Thank you, Michael. I can only imagine how unsettling this must have been for people who didn’t have a little over three decades of pop culture exposure warning them what the film was like.

  2. The interesting thing about the franchise is how each film is so different from each other. “Aliens” is an action/adventure movie. “Alien 3”, though much maligned–and I think unfairly so–is a good end to the initial trilogy. Even “Alien Resurrection” wasn’t as bad as people made out.

    • I’ve heard that Aliens is a pretty big shift in genre; it’ll be interesting to check it out one of these days. I’ll probably get to the others as well. I can easily believe that Alien: Resurrection isn’t as bad as people made out, though; people do seem to have a tendency to come down especially hard on late additions to franchises, whether they deserve it or not.

  3. Took me YEARS to learn to love the revelation about Ash. It was always my major complaint, too. I finally realized that included it broadened the reach of the movie to beyond just the ship and into a larger world. It added that “Evil Corporation”/conspiracy theory element, and also bolstered the sci fi quotient. Plus we get to watch Ian Holm stick his head through the floor and get covered in alfredo sauce. LOL 😀

    Glad to see this scored with you. Always get a little worried when you see people exposed to the classic youve loved since their release, viewing them for the first time in the modern context!

    • The “evil corporation” bit was great, but — at least for now — I feel like it would have been stronger (and darker) had Ash been a human being making that twisted decision. It would have added to the sense of wrongness about the whole thing, whereas being a robot, it just feels like it’s a mechanical decision on his part.

  4. CMrok93 says:

    Great review Morgan. This movie still gives me the chills and works perfectly when you take into consideration what it does with it’s atmosphere, mood, and pacing. A shame that Prometheus wasn’t the sci-fi spectacle everybody was expecting, but at least it reminded me of how awesome this flick truly is.

    • Yeah, I’m going to have to check out Prometheus now that I’ve seen this. I skipped it over the summer because Ridley Scott kept irritating me with his back-and-forth marketing on whether it was or wasn’t a prequel. I’ll give it a viewing sometime, and without the big hype behind it, we’ll see how it holds up.

  5. Its a great film but unfortunately it doesn’t hold up as well on revisited screenings I believe. In that sense I think Aliens hold up better.

    • Well, I know Fogs disagrees with you about the revisited screenings, but I can see how it would be that way for some. Most movies with a horror element have that problem, that’s for sure. Though in this case, since I already knew all the “scary” elements from 30+ years of pop culture references, any surprise factor is long gone. But we’ll see which one I think holds up better when I track down a copy of Aliens. Thanks for chiming in, Joel!

  6. Great review. I watched this one for the first time a couple months ago, just before Prometheus. It’s fantastic. The computers and consoles are the only thing that date this movie a bit, but everything else is so timeless. I for one loved the revelation about Ash. The gore was magnificent and I especially loved Weaver’s performance and the creature design.

    • Yeah, Weaver was fantastic in this. I don’t think it would have been near the classic it was with someone else in the role. And the creature design was fantastic; unearthly yet designed in such a way as to evoke primal fear.

  7. Eric says:

    I didn’t see this until just a couple years ago, and I felt pretty much the same way as you. It still holds up remarkably well, even with 30+ years perspective.

    Hope you check out Aliens soon. Will be interesting to see what side of the fence you land on for that one. For the record, I am firmly in the Alien camp. 🙂

  8. Nick says:

    i never knew fear until i saw this movie (thanks dad) when I was like 6. I about shit myself at the tense scenes and the xenomorphs which were utterly impressive from a technical and design standpoint. One of the best science fiction horror movies ever. Fantastic review.

  9. Pingback: Halloween Haunters 2012 Roundup | Morgan on Media

  10. Nostra says:

    Happy to read you finally saw this. I saw it for the first time fairly recently too (about a year and a half ago) and it’s such an amazing film…

Leave a comment:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s