Mockingbird Lane

1313 Mockingbird Lane was a proposed series for NBC, featuring an updated take on The Munsters, making it arguably a touch darker and shifting it to a dramatic comedy instead of the pure farce of the original series. As production costs rose, NBC gradually lost faith and decided to cut their losses; on October 26th, in an attempt to recoup the costs already sunk, they aired the pilot — directed by Bryan Singer — as a one-hour TV special, dropping the house number to make it simply Mockingbird Lane.

Watching failed TV pilots is always interesting. They’re often treated as made-for-TV movies, but they were meant to continue, and it’s usually clear where the series was meant to go from there. Even more importantly, it’s easy to see why they thought it could make it as a series — and why they thought it couldn’t. In the case of Mockingbird Lane, the merits of the series are clear, but it’s just as clear why it didn’t make it. With the budget they had to have had pouring into this, it needed to be great, and sadly it’s just “Okay”.

The problem with the series isn’t with the actors. Most of them do a pretty good job. Eddie Izzard is far and away the standout as Grandpa; if the series were to go on, I think he would easily have been the breakout character of the show. Charity Wakefield is Marilyn, the “normal” one of the group, and we just start to see hints that maybe she’s not so normal mentally after all. Portia di Rossi is properly alluring as Lily Munster, and although she doesn’t quite pull off the traditional vamp look, she may be the best cast aside from Grandpa as far as looking the way the character should. Playing Eddie is a young actor named Mason Cook; the character is played pretty much as a standard young boy, and the plot of the pilot is about him discovering he’s a werewolf and his family are monsters. Jerry O’Connell plays Herman Munster, and he’s far less bumbling than in the original series; much more of a standard concerned Dad. Despite the change in characterization, O’Connell is at least decent in the role, it’s just not a particularly unusual role.

The change in Herman is the best illustration of the two basic problems with the show. The first problem is that as a comedy-drama, it’s pretty lacking in the comedy department. It has fewer laughs per minute than the standard sitcom, which isn’t exactly a high bar to have to pass over. Izzard provides most of the laughs that are present. The bigger problem though, is that it’s not very Munstery. I’m not going to insist that “everything has to be the same” — what would be the point of a remake otherwise? — but this is barely recognizable. Take a look at the promo picture up above… does anybody there, aside from Grandpa, even look like a Munster? Herman could, and does, pass as a normal human being, despite being a Frankenstein-style monster. The core of humor in The Munsters was the juxtaposition of traditional family values with a non traditional family, and the normal neighbors with the decidedly abnormal Munsters. When the Munsters look and act perfectly normal, the point of the whole thing gets a lot fuzzier than Eddie does.

Throw in some stilted dialogue and the usual first-episode jitters, and Mockingbird Lane doesn’t come out of the gates as the sure-fire hit that a film with this kind of budget needs to be. Granted, they did put that budget to great use; other than the rather hokey werewolf look for Eddie, most of the special effects were fantastic; Portia di Rossi’s arrival as Lily, assembling herself from mist and spiders, was particularly noteworthy. But great special effects don’t save Mockingbird Lane from feeling like a middle-of-the-road sit-com/drama or from feeling like the Munsters portrayed aren’t The Munsters.

Rating: 3 Pumpkins

About Morgan R. Lewis

Fan of movies and other media
This entry was posted in Halloween Haunters, Television Talk and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Mockingbird Lane

  1. I thought the writing and humor was clever and charming. And I really liked Eddie Izzard as grandpa. Also the sets and especially the house was great. Unfortunately that’s almost all that I liked. I thought the casting decisions (Izzard aside) were all very poor. Obviously the worst decision was Jerry O’Connell as Herman. There’s nothing inherently bad about Jerry O’Connell, but he’s so clearly wrong as the role of Herman Munster. He’s a pretty boy in a role needing someone with a lot more presence. Also Liily contained exactly zero vampiness. Marilyn seemed like maybe she might be a fun character, and aside from Grandpa had all the best lines. And seriously, would it have killed them to give Eddie a widow’s peak?

    Still I would have gladly given Bryan Fuller the benefit of the doubt and watched any series he was writing (I absolutely LOVED Pushing Daisies).

    • Definitely right about O’Connell… no presence, and he just didn’t seem like anything other than standard sitcom father. All of them but Izzard just seemed to be too “normal” to me. But yes, had this gone on as a series (or if NBC decides to pick it up after all, which is unlikely), I would have given it at least a couple more episodes to win me over.

  2. ruth says:

    Bryan Singer directed this? Interesting! I quite like that title, reminds me of To Kill A Mockingbird though obviously there’s no similarities, ahah.

    • The title isn’t bad, especially since it was their address in the original series. I’m still not sure why they’d want to make a Munsters show without naming the Munsters in the title, though.

      • Scophi says:

        My guess is that they wanted they wanted the freedom to reboot the show with a slightly different feel, which they did, without upsetting die-hard Munster fans…assuming there are any.

        I’m fine with the title…and even the different tone of the show…although I’m not quite sure what it is yet. Dark comedy? Supernatural? Family drama? I haven’t decided yet. It’s not funny enough to be a comedy, not serious enough to be supernatural, and not wholesome enough to be a family drama. Hmm.

        Still, it’s interesting and I’ll continue to watch the show until they cancel it. Let’s face it, this is not likely to be a long running endeavor…even being paired up in the right time slot with Grimm.

        As much I hate to admit it, Jerry O’Connell’s character is definitely flat. I don’t know if it’s him of the writers, but it doesn’t add anything to the show. I’m sure they want this series to be all about the father-son relationship, but it’s not starting off in the right direction. All emphasis was on Grandpa. The coming-of-age son was just a side note.

        I’ve liked JO’C since Sliders. But he’s not good for shows. Like Christian Slater, bring him aboard and the show is unlikely to last a season…I’m not sure why. He definitely has draw, but not enough depth. Defenders, Eastwick, Do Not Disturb, Carpoolers… Outside of Sliders and Crossing Jordan he hasn’t been very successful.

        • Well, as far as waiting until it’s been canceled, that happened before it aired, unfortunately — they ran the pilot to recoup their losses after deciding not to pick it up, and any hopes of the series continuing were contingent on it getting out-of-the-park ratings. It did OK, but I don’t think it did well enough for NBC to change their mind.

          I think the flatness of Herman was more on the writers than on O’Connell… he’s been enjoyable in a lot of other things (though you’re right about him being cursed with shortlived shows.)

          I hear you on not being sure exactly what tone the show was going for. I think that’s one of the glaring weaknesses of it — it doesn’t feel like the writers knew what they wanted it to be either.

  3. Pingback: Halloween Haunters 2012 Roundup | Morgan on Media

Leave a comment:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s