Post-Mortem: Fringe

Fringe Amber TitleFringe has come to a conclusion, after five seasons on the air. It’s been a heck of a ride, and while I wouldn’t say it was perfect, I would certainly say it had more ups than downs. With the final episode airing last night, it’s time for me to take a look back at the series and how it evolved, and what I did and didn’t like. Obviously, there will be spoilers; if you haven’t seen the finale, go check your DVR and come back later.

I missed the first few episodes of Fringe when it launched five years ago, but it didn’t take long for me to find out about it and get caught up in it. The premise, of an FBI agent (Anna Torv as Olivia Dunham) assigned to investigate paranormal incidents with a team of civilian scientists, had a lot of potential. It bore some surface similarity to The X-Files in its concept, but the execution was different, because Fringe made no bones about what was going on. If there was a cover-up, the Fringe team wasn’t in the group being kept out of the loop. In The X-Files, “the truth [was] out there”. In Fringe, the truth was right there, and probably trying to gnaw your face off.

It made for an exciting and intelligent show. In the first season, it mostly kept to a “monster of the week” format, where the Fringe team would investigate a different threat each time, all of them apparently unrelated. But even then there were hints that there was something underneath it all, as too many of the cases seemed related to Walter Bishop’s earlier research projects. It’s a quandary that a lot of shows, particularly genre shows, have to face: the question of whether to stay as a “threat of the week” show, or to start adding a “myth arc”, where an overriding plot line starts shaping the seasons. The former means that viewers won’t get lost, and it’s possible to maintain the same level of quality — a bad storyline will only ruin one episode instead of a whole season. But it’s hard to maintain viewer interest without the ongoing story arc, and Fringe, as with most sci-fi shows, started introducing arcs with the second season. This initially took the form of the threats unleashed by David Robert Jones, and his mysterious agenda regarding otherworldly invaders, but was eventually sidelined by the alternate universe.

The alternate universe gave most of the actors a chance to really show their range, as the alternate versions of their characters often turned out rather differently (save for Joshua Jackson, whose character Peter only existed in one universe). It also provided a plot line that could last for a few seasons, establishing a conflict where neither side is entirely right or entirely wrong. It’s one thing to establish a “mirror universe” where everyone is evil. It’s another thing entirely to create an alternate universe where people are just as good or bad, but are driven to interdimensional war out of desperation to survive — with that survival jeopardized by an act that was made with the most benevolent of intentions.

If there was a point where the series stumbled a bit, it was in the fourth season. It felt as if the writers had painted themselves into a corner with the alternate universe, and wanted to hit the reset button in a lot of ways. They altered the timeline, brought back David Robert Jones (Jared Harris), and even revisited a lot of the plots from the earlier seasons. While it was still interesting, it couldn’t escape the feeling of familiarity.

For the fifth season, the writers knew they were writing for the final season, and decided to shake things up quite a bit. Foreshadowed by a fourth season episode — one which would have been much better served had it simply been the premiere of the fifth season — the final season was set significantly in the future. The Observers, who had always seemed benevolent or at least benign, were now ruling the world with an iron fist. Peter and Olivia’s daughter, Henrietta (Georgina Haig) was the leader of the resistance, and the Fringe team was brought into the future by having been preserved in amber during the duration. There were some issues with this season — notably, the explanation for the difference in the Observers’ behavior wasn’t explained until late into it (that explanation being that the first wave were simply scouts and were unaware of their society’s larger plans). Additionally, while the season did explore a bit of what it means to be human, via Peter experimenting with Observer tech, it didn’t address the moral issues of weaponizing the fringe events, which could have provided a bit more depth to the season. But perhaps most importantly, while the season was still fun and interesting, it felt separate from all the previous seasons. The first four seasons sometimes went in different directions, but they felt like the same show; season five felt more like a sequel series, the same characters in a new show. This is not to say that it was bad; just that it didn’t feel quite like Fringe any more.

Nevertheless, the show still succeeded where it always did, which is with the characters. On one level, the characters of Olivia, Peter, and Astrid aren’t anything special by genre standards. They’re not flat characters, but neither are they unusually deep; any show which runs for five seasons should have that approximate level of characterization. But there was enough exploration of each character throughout the seasons, including the last one, to give each a fully rounded personality, and to make the cast interactions interesting and believable. And then there’s Walter. Played magnificently by John Noble, Walter Bishop is simply one of the best characters to have been on television in the past several years. Alternately childlike and egotistical, he’s a mad scientist who is both funny and a little frightening at the same time. Capable of fantastic feats of scientific genius, yet utterly helpless in the outside world. A man who was once a monster, ruthless in his pursuit of knowledge, and was so appalled by what he’d become that he literally cut his own brain open to prevent himself from ever becoming that man again. During the course of five seasons, alternate universes and timelines and flashbacks, Walter is shown to be capable and helpless, jovial and callous, monstrous and saintlike. He is an extraordinarily complex character, and yet despite all the dichotomies to his personality, every stage of every version of him is nevertheless immediately recognizable as being the same man, all the seeming contradictions forming one cohesive whole. It is very rare that a television character has seemed both larger than life and so perfectly real at the same time… let alone also being highly entertaining to watch.

After five seasons, it was probably time for Fringe to go. But I’m going to miss the intelligent writing, and the numerous respectful nods to science fiction and fantasy greats; I remember one of the first ones I caught being when they referred to “the Zelazny building”. I’m going to miss the creative and downright freaky ideas the writers came up with for fringe events. And I’m going to miss watching a character as fun and fascinating as Walter Bishop.

About Morgan R. Lewis

Fan of movies and other media
This entry was posted in Television Talk and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Post-Mortem: Fringe

  1. Wow. That was a quick turnaround. LOL Great series… it was a lot of fun in a lot of ways.

    My main regret about Fringe is that it was the victim of Network television scheduling in many ways. That first seaon, as you mentioned, tried to be a “Monster of the week” in order to succeed as a procedural. I bet that if the show had done well in the ratings that way, it would have stayed “Monster of the week” forever.

    I’m glad it didn’t, but, still, it makes for an uneven feel. Because then they let go of that and focused on the core mythology of the dual universes and Peter/Walter… except they never knew if they were going to be renewed. Which led most egregiously to the Non Series Finale Series Finale at the end of season 4. Which they put there due to not knowing if theyd be renewed for season 5. Then when season five came back, it felt disconnected to all the rest of it… as you mentioned, there was a huge difference in tone.

    I liked Fringe quite a bit, I think John Noble should have a truck full of Emmys for his work here, and the rest of the cast was good to great at times too. Even the great guests they got. It probably WAS time for it to go, but I’ll always wish it had a fairer shake along the way… I think if the writers were given the same number of episodes right at the beginning – if they knew when it would end… they could have come up with something more cohesive.

    As you said though, not to say it was bad. I just bet it could have been even better. 😦

    • Definitely true about the network scheduling… this changed slots what, three times? That’s a rough thing for any series to take. I don’t know if it would have stayed as “Monster of the Week” anyway, but it’s certainly a possibility.

      I agree that had the writers known from the beginning exactly how many episodes they had, they could have written something that fit together better. Truthfully, I think that’s the case with a lot of series. We’ll probably never see it happen, though, at least not with anything that’s meant to be more than one season.

      And yes, truck full of Emmys for John Noble. He’s seriously overlooked by the awards ceremonies.

  2. Scophi says:

    Fringe has been my favorite shows for the past five years and I consider it almost a perfect series. It was different enough to stand apart from the pack, intelligent enough to keep me interested for five seasons, and accessible enough for widespread acceptance.

    I say “almost” the perfect series because it was indeed disjointed at times. The non sequitur season five took a while to gain traction with me and there were plot particles that seemed to be brought out of the closet when it suited them (like cortexiphan). I’m sure that with a full 22-episodes, season five would have been fleshed out better.

    I’m still working on last night’s ending. I still have a lot of questions about the timeline reset. But hopefully that will come with a little more thought and watching some reruns.

    I’d like to add my voice to the list of those who think John Noble was the show. One of the best character performances I have ever watched.

    Thanks for the review!

    (End the oppression! Resist!)

    • The disjointed nature, and the “Oh yeah” aspect of the “plot particles”, as you put it, are indeed the show’s biggest problems. But like you, I enjoyed it despite those issues.

      I thought the ending for the show was about as good as it could be, all things considered. But yes, there are certainly questions to be asked about the timeline reset… although that’s pretty much always an issue when time travel is involved.

  3. alloogs says:

    Fringe was one of those shows I always wanted to watch but never got around to it. Seems like now that its over it may be a good time. At least I won’t always be playing catch up.

  4. Jaina says:

    Boy am I going to miss Fringe. While I’m sad it’s gone, I think it was a good time to go. Five seasons isn’t bad for a sci-fi network TV show which seemed to have been hated by its own network from day one.

    I liked that, in the end, the show was the story of fathers and their sons. And eventual daughters too. Maybe that part of the full circle aspect of the finale was a bit fudged, it didn’t fail to bring tears to my eyes. Strangely though, the one moment which gave me the biggest lump in my throat (followed by eventual tears) was Astrid’s goodbye to Walter. I loved how their relationship built up and evolved over the series.

    John Noble was fantastic. It is horrible that his performance on Fringe was never truly recognised by the awards he should have been showered with.

    Wonder when we’ll get our next, intelligent network sci-fi TV show.

    • Yeah, the “sins of the fathers” aspect was really strong in Fringe. While the end was a bit of a tear-jerker in that respect, it also felt appropriate.

      I liked Walter’s farewell to Astrid as well.

      Real good question on the next intelligent network sci-fi show… the smart ones don’t really come up too often, and they always have a rough time in the ratings.

  5. I never got into Fringe…it’s just one of those that slipped through the cracks of the multitude of tv shows I try to follow.

    That being said, I”m sure I will catch it sometime in the future. Your last paragraph praises the writing which already has me more interested.

    Farewell Fringe on TV and Hello Fringe on Netflix soon! 🙂

Leave a comment:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s