Rocky IV

Rocky IV PosterIt’s been a while since I’ve reviewed a Rocky movie here, and I felt it was about time to visit another entry in the series. After all, today is Boxing Day, and Rocky IV even has its title match take place on Christmas Day — although if one misses that announcement one would never notice when the film was allegedly set.

Released in 1985, Rocky IV is just as cheesy as its immediate predecessor. There’s even a surprisingly advanced robot that is a gift to Rocky’s brother-in-law, for no particular reason other than to just show off how rich Rocky has become. Some people might think that the film being cheesy would be to its detriment; on the contrary, in this case it’s one of the film’s saving graces. In truth, it actually needs to be a little cheesier yet to be completely entertaining.

RockyIV-0357

Perhaps more James Brown would have helped.

Rocky IV brings in a challenger from the East, Russian amateur boxing champion Ivan Drago (Dolph Lundgren). Drago is looking for new challenges and to demonstrate that the Soviet Union (1985, remember) is the superior country in athletics. This naturally brings him into conflict with America’s boxing champions, and after Apollo Creed (Carl Weathers) is demolished in an exhibition match, Rocky agrees to face Drago on his own turf — Moscow.

The fights are fun to watch, and the banter between Weathers and Stallone early on is solid. Talia Shire also gives a good performance as the increasingly-concerned Adrian. There are hints of emotional depth in the film, with Creed and Balboa each dealing with the prospect of aging and retirement in their own way, and Adrian’s concerns, and the U.S. vs. U.S.S.R. angle, plus a note of tragedy in the film. However, the film never quite seems to strike emotional chords as well as the first film did. This would be fine if it made up for it in other ways, but it’s also not really cheesy enough to succeed on that level either.

The problem, in a way, is Ivan Drago. Lundgren is a physically imposing figure, particularly in this film, but as a character, he’s a bit of a flat, snarling menace. He says perhaps a dozen words throughout the film; the rest is conveyed through his wife, played by Brigitte Nielsen. If the goal is to make Drago seem like an inhuman force, it succeeds, but it also means that Drago is not particularly interesting as a character. His few words are mostly taunts, but they lack the weight of the taunts thrown by previous characters such as Clubber Lang because Drago’s personality isn’t as developed.

As for the action, the training sequences feel redundant at this point. The music was fun, but we’ve seen Rocky train before, and having him run up a Russian mountain just doesn’t feel any different from him running up the steps of the Philadelphia courthouse. The fights are good, though, particularly the final bout, which aptly shows Rocky being given a tremendous challenge while also showing that Rocky has a chance to win.

It’s a reasonably fun film, and fans of the series won’t want to miss it. But it’s definitely in “fans only” territory, as it never quite succeeds in being its own film.

Rating: 3 Stars

Advertisements

About Morgan R. Lewis

Fan of movies and other media
This entry was posted in Movie Reviews and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Rocky IV

  1. jjames36 says:

    I don’t know why, exactly, but I have only ever seen the first. And this one.

    It was a long time ago, but I remember having the same feelings as I was watching this one. Really for fans, not a standalone film. Characters, especially the villain, were lacking, etc.

    Good review.

  2. Dan Heaton says:

    I’d argue that Rocky IV is a lot cheesier even than Rocky III, and that’s saying a lot. Both follow a very familiar formula (the villain wins, someone dies, and then Rocky stands up and takes charge), but I have a soft spot for them. What amazed me when I watched Rocky IV again was how short it is. It isn’t even 90 minutes from what I remember, and it’s probably a wise choice.

    • It’s right at 90 minutes (OK, probably just a bit short if the credits aren’t counted), so yeah, it’s reasonably short for a feature film. I’ll agree that it’s a good decision, though; like you say, it’s starting to get formulaic.

      It is fun, though.

  3. CMrok93 says:

    On Boxing Day, you chose to review this. I like your style, Morgan!

  4. Hah, somehow I forgot Rocky IV’s big fight was on Christmas Day. “Fans only” is a good way to put this — it’s cheesy fun, but not exactly a great film.

  5. jeffro517 says:

    I think it’s safe to say that any of the Rocky sequels were for “fans” only. Thankfully you nailed it when you pointed out that the cheesy nature of the film is part of the success. Nice review!

  6. Pingback: Non-Obvious Christmas Movies? | Morgan on Media

Leave a comment:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s